Transparency report · 2020 H1

January to June 2020

10 legal requests to Frothly about Glossia. User data disclosed: none.

Requests by type

Requests to Frothly by type, January to June 2020
TypeReceived
Demands for user dataSubpoenas, court orders and warrants seeking information about a person who uses Glossia.9
Emergency requestsRequests made without legal process where someone’s life or safety was said to be at risk.1
Requests about relaysDemands for logs, traffic or access to a relay that Frothly runs.0
Requests to remove or block contentGlossia carries only encrypted messages, so there is nothing for us to remove.0
Demands to weaken GlossiaDemands to add a way to read messages, or to change the software to help someone do so.0
Total10

Where requests came from

Requests to Frothly by region of origin, January to June 2020
RegionRequests
Europe2
Latin America and the Caribbean1
Middle East and Central Asia2
South and Southeast Asia1
East Asia1
Oceania3

We report regions rather than countries where a single request could identify the person it concerned.

What we disclosed

No user data. We do not have messages, contact lists, account details, phone numbers or logs of who connected to which relay, so there was nothing to disclose.

Notes

Requests rose with traffic in the first half of 2020. None resulted in the disclosure of user data, because there is none to disclose.