Transparency report · 2017 H2

July to December 2017

11 legal requests to Frothly about Glossia. User data disclosed: none.

Requests by type

Requests to Frothly by type, July to December 2017
TypeReceived
Demands for user dataSubpoenas, court orders and warrants seeking information about a person who uses Glossia.10
Emergency requestsRequests made without legal process where someone’s life or safety was said to be at risk.1
Requests about relaysDemands for logs, traffic or access to a relay that Frothly runs.0
Requests to remove or block contentGlossia carries only encrypted messages, so there is nothing for us to remove.0
Demands to weaken GlossiaDemands to add a way to read messages, or to change the software to help someone do so.0
Total11

Where requests came from

Requests to Frothly by region of origin, July to December 2017
RegionRequests
North America4
Europe1
Latin America and the Caribbean2
Middle East and Central Asia2
Oceania2

We report regions rather than countries where a single request could identify the person it concerned.

What we disclosed

No user data. We do not have messages, contact lists, account details, phone numbers or logs of who connected to which relay, so there was nothing to disclose.

Notes

Police in a European country seized a server running a partner relay, as part of an unrelated investigation into its hosting provider. The relay held no readable messages and no logs. Its keys were revoked within the hour, and the operator listed a replacement two weeks later. The server was returned, unopened, in 2019.